Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Announced July 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony A200, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and A200 (10MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M5 III was manufactured 11 years later than the A200 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M5 III matches up against the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony A200
E-M5 III | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2019 | ![]() | July 2008 | More recent by 137 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-M5 III
A200 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony A200
E-M5 III | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III has got outer measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony A200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 III vs the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c02c/7c02c6a25447dd008090408d9469d6807b1a4152" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and A200 is 80 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59ecc/59ecc7f8e12bfde5e474deb9d0215bc7cbc28b37" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and A200.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will resolve more detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495eb/495eb8c8c036ce05503b77841a7ec1791a9d495d" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25b13/25b13b9754ae9c5b12b07feb719bd7655d03a2ca" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2008-07-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lbs) | 572 gr (1.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Compact Flash |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,199 | $100 |