Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
67 Imaging
50 Features
50 Overall
50
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched May 2009
- Earlier Model is Sony A300
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and A330 (10MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and A330 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M5 III was brought out 10 years later than the A330 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-M5 III scores versus the A330 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony Alpha DSLR-A330. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony A330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony A330
E-M5 III | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | May 2009 | More recent by 127 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus E-M5 III
A330 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony A330
E-M5 III | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III provides outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Sony A330 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-M5 III versus the A330.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and A330 is 80 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specifications. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and A330.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M5 III will render more detail having its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2009-05-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 lb) | 529g (1.17 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 535 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 230 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $1,199 | $545 |