Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330

Portability
80
Imaging
62
Features
88
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front
Portability
67
Imaging
50
Features
50
Overall
50

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Introduced October 2019
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
  • Replacement is OM System OM-5
Sony A330
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Earlier Model is Sony A300
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Overview

Below is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and A330 (10MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and A330 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M5 III was brought out 10 years later than the A330 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-M5 III scores versus the A330 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony A330

 E-M5 III A330 
LaunchedOctober 2019May 2009More recent by 127 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kCrisper display (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus E-M5 III

 A330 E-M5 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony A330

 E-M5 III A330 
Focus manually Very exact focusing

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III provides outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Sony A330 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-M5 III versus the A330.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and A330 is 80 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specifications. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and A330.

To sum up, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M5 III will render more detail having its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Portrait photography highlights
Sony A330 Portrait photography highlights
77
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
62
focusing manually
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
features face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Street photography factors
Sony A330 Street photography factors
83
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
boasts touch focus
environment sealing
good ISO range (25,600)
75
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Sports photography camera
Sony A330 as a Sports photography camera
76
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (30.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect AF
bad battery pack (310 shots)
50
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports phase detect AF
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
terrible battery life (230 CIPA)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Travel photography advice
Sony A330 Travel photography advice
77
environment sealing
supports bluetooth
boasts touch focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
bad battery pack (310 shots)
44
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
terrible battery life (230 per charge)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Landscape photography highlights
Sony A330 Landscape photography highlights
77
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
environment sealing
bad battery pack (310 per charge)
54
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
terrible battery life (230 shots)
missing Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Vlogging camera
Sony A330 as a Vlogging camera
84
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focusing
good video quality (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes microphone jack
9
can't shoot video
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Sony A330
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIISony Alpha DSLR-A330
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Type Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2019-10-17 2009-05-18
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII Bionz
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 1,040k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 30.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 414g (0.91 lb) 529g (1.17 lb)
Physical dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 535
Other
Battery life 310 pictures 230 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $1,199 $545