Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A560
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
64 Imaging
54 Features
78 Overall
63
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A560 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Released October 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Later Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 599g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Revealed August 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A500
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A560 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony A560, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and A560 (14MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and A560 (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M5 III was launched 9 years after the A560 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A560 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-M5 III scores vs the A560 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A560 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony Alpha DSLR-A560. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony A560 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony A560
E-M5 III | A560 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | August 2010 | Newer by 112 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 922k | Sharper display (+118k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A560 over the Olympus E-M5 III
A560 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony A560
E-M5 III | A560 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A560 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III offers physical dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Sony A560 has proportions of 137mm x 104mm x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") along with a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony A560 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M5 III compared to the A560.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and A560 is 80 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A560 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and A560.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-M5 III will produce more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 III should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A560 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A560 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A560 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A560 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2019-10-17 | 2010-08-24 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lbs) | 599 grams (1.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 817 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 1050 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | Two |
Launch cost | $1,199 | $650 |