Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A6300
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Renewed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony A6000
- Updated by Sony A6500
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A6300 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A6300, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 III (20MP) and the A6300 (24MP) is very similar but the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and A6300 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M5 III was released 3 years later than the A6300 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-M5 III scores vs the A6300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony Alpha a6300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony A6300
E-M5 III | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | February 2016 | More recent by 46 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 922k | Sharper display (+118k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus E-M5 III
A6300 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony A6300
E-M5 III | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 III provides exterior dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A6300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 III vs the A6300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and A6300 is 80 and 83 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and A6300.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Sony A6300 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 III will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-10-17 | 2016-02-03 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Available lenses | 107 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lbs) | 404 gr (0.89 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 400 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $1,199 | $889 |