Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony H300
Portability
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Portability
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony H300 Key Specs
Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Newer Model is OM System OM-5
Sony H300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Launched February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony H300 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony H300, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 III (20MP) and the H300 (20MP) is very well matched but the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and H300 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M5 III was manufactured 5 years after the H300 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M5 III grades versus the H300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony H300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony H300
| E-M5 III | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2019 |  | February 2014 | More modern by 70 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Olympus E-M5 III
| H300 | E-M5 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony H300
| E-M5 III | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 III enjoys outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Sony H300 has measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony H300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M5 III compared to the H300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and H300 is 80 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The picture underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and H300.
Plainly, both cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizes. The E-M5 III offers the larger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field simpler. The fresher E-M5 III is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III Portrait photography information
Sony H300 Portrait photography information
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
megapixel count decent (20MP)
has face detect focusing
manual focus not available
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III Street photography factors
Sony H300 Street photography factors
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
features touch focus
weather proof
very good ISO range (25,600)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than others (590g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III Sports photography features
Sony H300 Sports photography features
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high max frames per second (30.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
supports phase detect AF
low battery life (310 per charge)
excellent zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
has tracking focus
better than average battery life (350 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III Travel photography info
Sony H300 Travel photography info
weather proof
supports bluetooth
features touch focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
low battery life (310 CIPA)
better than average battery life (350 CIPA)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (875mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than others (590 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III as a Landscape photography camera
Sony H300 as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
low battery life (310 CIPA)
rather wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
better than average battery life (350 shots)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus E-M5 III
Vlogging with Sony H300
screen is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focusing
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external microphone port
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone port
more heavy than others (590 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony H300 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2019-10-17 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3-5.9 |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lbs) | 590 gr (1.30 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 shots | 350 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $1,199 | $249 |