Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX10 II
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
58 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Renewed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Launched June 2015
- Older Model is Sony RX10
- Successor is Sony RX10 III
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX10 II Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M5 III versus Sony RX10 II, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 III (20MP) and the RX10 II (20MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and RX10 II (1") come with different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M5 III was manufactured 4 years later than the RX10 II and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M5 III matches up against the RX10 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX10 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Sony RX10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony RX10 II
E-M5 III | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | June 2015 | Fresher by 53 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Olympus E-M5 III
RX10 II | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1229k | 1040k | Sharper screen (+189k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony RX10 II
E-M5 III | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with exterior dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Sony RX10 II has measurements of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") along with a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 III versus Sony RX10 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 III compared to the RX10 II.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and RX10 II is 80 and 58 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The photograph underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and RX10 II.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III has got the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The more modern E-M5 III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2015-06-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 lbs) | 813g (1.79 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 400 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $1,199 | $998 |