Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX100 V
Portability
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
Portability
89 Imaging
52 Features
80 Overall
63
89 Imaging
52 Features
80 Overall
63
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs
Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Refreshed by OM System OM-5
Sony RX100 V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Announced October 2016
- Succeeded the Sony RX100 IV
- Later Model is Sony RX100 VI
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX100 V Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Sony RX100 V, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M5 III (20MP) and the RX100 V (20MP) is pretty similar but the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and RX100 V (1") have totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M5 III was revealed 3 years after the RX100 V which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M5 III grades versus the RX100 V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX100 V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony RX100 V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony RX100 V
| E-M5 III | RX100 V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2019 |  | October 2016 | More modern by 37 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Olympus E-M5 III
| RX100 V | E-M5 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 1040k | Sharper screen (+189k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony RX100 V
| E-M5 III | RX100 V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III has got outside dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 V has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 III versus Sony RX100 V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M5 III and the RX100 V.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and RX100 V is 80 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading a spec sheet. The image here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and RX100 V.
As you can see, the two cameras have the same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-M5 III has the bigger sensor which will make obtaining bokeh simpler. The younger E-M5 III is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III Portrait photography information
Sony RX100 V Portrait photography information
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
saves RAW formats
manual focus
above average flash sync speed (1/2,000 seconds)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
provides face detect focus
delivers RAW files
external flash not possible
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III as a Street photography camera
Sony RX100 V as a Street photography camera
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
boasts touch focus
weather proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (299 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III Sports photography advice
Sony RX100 V Sports photography advice
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
max frames per second high (30.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
weather proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
bad battery (310 shots)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (24.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
provides tracking focus
has phase detect auto focus
not so great battery life (220 shots)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III Travel photography info
Sony RX100 V Travel photography info
weather proof
supports bluetooth
boasts touch focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
bad battery (310 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (299g)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
reasonably wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
not so great battery life (220 shots)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III Landscape photography factors
Sony RX100 V Landscape photography factors
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
bad battery (310 CIPA)
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
not so great battery life (220 shots)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging advice
Sony RX100 V Vlogging advice
selfie friendly display
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes mic socket
reasonably wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
display is selfie friendly
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (299 grams)
lack of microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX100 V Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2016-10-06 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 315 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per second | 24.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 414g (0.91 pounds) | 299g (0.66 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 586 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 shots | 220 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $1,199 | $998 |