Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX1R
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released June 2013
- Renewed by Sony RX1R II
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX1R Overview
Following is a extended review of the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony RX1R, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M5 III (20MP) and the RX1R (24MP) is very well matched but the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and RX1R (Full frame) use totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M5 III was launched 6 years after the RX1R which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M5 III grades vs the RX1R with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX1R Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony RX1R
E-M5 III | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | June 2013 | More modern by 77 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Olympus E-M5 III
RX1R | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1229k | 1040k | Sharper display (+189k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony RX1R
E-M5 III | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III has got physical dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Sony RX1R has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony RX1R in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M5 III vs the RX1R.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and RX1R is 80 and 79 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The pic underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and RX1R.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 III because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony RX1R will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2013-06-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 pounds) | 482 gr (1.06 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 91 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 270 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,199 | $2,798 |