Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony T900
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
- New Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony T900 Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony T900, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M5 III was introduced 10 years later than the T900 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M5 III matches up against the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony T900
E-M5 III | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | February 2009 | Fresher by 130 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 922k | Crisper screen (+118k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-M5 III
T900 | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony T900
E-M5 III | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III provides exterior measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 III compared to the T900.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 III and T900 is 80 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and T900.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will deliver extra detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 III provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2019-10-17 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 pounds) | 143 gr (0.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,199 | $300 |