Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W220
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Released October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Renewed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W220 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-M5 III versus Sony W220, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and W220 (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and W220 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M5 III was launched 10 years later than the W220 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M5 III grades against the W220 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W220 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony W220
| E-M5 III | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2019 | January 2009 | More recent by 132 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus E-M5 III
| W220 | E-M5 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony W220
| E-M5 III | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III offers physical measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Sony W220 has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Sony W220 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 III compared to the W220.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and W220 is 80 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and W220.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2019-10-17 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lbs) | 147 grams (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $1,199 | $160 |