Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W320
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71


97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Updated by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W320 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W320, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and W320 (14MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and W320 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

The E-M5 III was introduced 9 years later than the W320 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M5 III matches up vs the W320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony W320
E-M5 III | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 119 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus E-M5 III
W320 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony W320
E-M5 III | W320 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 III offers physical dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has measurements of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M5 III against the W320.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and W320 is 80 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and W320.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will give greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2019-10-17 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 4cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 lb) | 117g (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,199 | $269 |