Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A65
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Released October 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Later Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2011
- Replacement is Sony A68
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A65 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A65, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M5 III (20MP) and the A65 (24MP) is very close but the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M5 III was brought out 8 years later than the A65 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M5 III matches up vs the A65 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A65 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony SLT-A65. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony A65
E-M5 III | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2019 | November 2011 | Fresher by 97 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 921k | Clearer display (+119k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-M5 III
A65 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony A65
E-M5 III | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III offers outside measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Sony A65 has dimensions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A65 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M5 III against the A65.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and A65 is 80 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and A65.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A65 will provide you with more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger E-M5 III will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony A65 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony SLT-A65 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2019-10-17 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lb) | 622 gr (1.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 560 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $1,199 | $700 |