Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus SP-565UZ, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M5 was unveiled 3 years after the SP-565UZ which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M5 grades vs the SP-565UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M5 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 41 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M5
SP-565UZ | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M5 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus SP-565UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 against the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdb05/bdb05f2d5c0a1d54eea541f8ab8505d2979d4137" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 and SP-565UZ is 81 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55f4e/55f4ec8c23b2e37c56ab90c15b88b90897eef4fe" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and SP-565UZ.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 having a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M5 will offer extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3637/e3637d9e6c54e6345b7c68dd3bdc31dab4bc4f0f" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/688cd/688cd6b7212d46887e602035c7fd947053de7525" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-04-30 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 610k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425g (0.94 lb) | 413g (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $799 | $400 |