Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Launched April 2012
- New Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is fairly similar but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M5 was announced 2 years after the SP-800 UZ which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M5 grades versus the SP-800 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-M5 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 28 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-M5
SP-800 UZ | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-M5 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 features physical dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M5 and the SP-800 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ed3c/9ed3cfa11ca5544d095cdc2f784df965a0c29b6b" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 and SP-800 UZ is 81 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cfe4/0cfe498abc02ecb0852d205614f8ae983c70f9a5" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 and SP-800 UZ.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M5 will offer greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/869ad/869ad5915ae37f61852cdcfcd985db1dd9e74da7" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33731/337314193b0fb0e0ce3b21deb9940edff45bda22" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-04-30 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 610k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 12 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425g (0.94 lb) | 455g (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $799 | $270 |