Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- New Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is very similar but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M5 was launched 3 years prior to the SH-2 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-M5 scores against the SH-2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus SH-2
E-M5 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-M5
SH-2 | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2015 | ![]() | April 2012 | Fresher by 34 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus SH-2
E-M5 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 provides external measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-M5 versus the SH-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11ecf/11ecf4be4a8c8dc92be2cff7c1831b8f6789ba27" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 and SH-2 is 81 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7945c/7945cbf8313a31b5b150bb8040df4b5dcde66682" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 and SH-2.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical MP but not the same sensor sizing. The E-M5 features the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier. The older E-M5 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c988d/c988db2c496edf4c60749631c51811bca3add78f" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/087c5/087c576421aedd502c684de0c84fc8d0fe6e3034" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-04-30 | 2015-03-11 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 610k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425 gr (0.94 lb) | 271 gr (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 380 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $399 |