Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus Tough-3000, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M5 was introduced 2 years after the Tough-3000 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M5 matches up against the Tough-3000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-M5 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 29 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-M5
Tough-3000 | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-M5 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 provides external dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-M5 versus the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab181/ab181a237b5f5ee23906c4b486047845b1edfa91" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 and Tough-3000 is 81 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d29c/8d29c2069edeaa40504e8451d01da53a8c567c7d" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 and Tough-3000.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 will resolve greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad2b2/ad2b24f77700654f68edddbbaf632fb4f9832f0f" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecf2a/ecf2a02f3cff0eb5e48b9d49b04546d88e8ec0a0" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2012-04-30 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425 gr (0.94 lb) | 159 gr (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $799 | $0 |