Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Launched April 2012
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-M5 versus Olympus TG-320, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively similar but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M5 was unveiled 4 months later than the TG-320 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M5 scores against the TG-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus TG-320
E-M5 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-M5
TG-320 | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus TG-320
E-M5 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | Similar generation |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 provides outer measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 versus Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 against the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd0e6/bd0e6928f8af579d565ba2c9de42e2b6efbb39b0" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 and TG-320 is 81 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9ca8/d9ca88199337ea7aad2c3123b7ebd26dd9f83b58" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 and TG-320.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M5 will deliver greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b36a7/b36a7522f34c61033ff9e6df405617f49d9d25a9" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72e68/72e68c77ec8bef577bd31ae8026084896addaf4d" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus TG-320 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2012-04-30 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425 grams (0.94 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 150 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $799 | $0 |