Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M5 was brought out 14 months earlier than the TG-2 iHS making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M5 grades against the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M5 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M5
TG-2 iHS | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | ![]() | April 2012 | More recent by 14 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M5 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 610k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 offers exterior measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 against the TG-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69389/69389ff9c1e2c948100bf4725a8d1c555713bd22" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and TG-2 iHS is 81 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18a22/18a227026aa3ba8f7be60bfe3f34e4b27df968e8" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 will provide you with extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images way more aggressively. The older E-M5 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98080/980803a51019b880059f7af552a2b152c01b32a0" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ecd2/0ecd21d0bc9be519966a3674914bdbf999925760" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-04-30 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 610k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425 grams (0.94 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 350 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $799 | $380 |