Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Announced April 2012
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus VR-320, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very similar but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M5 was announced 10 months after the VR-320 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-M5 grades vs the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus VR-320
E-M5 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 10 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-M5
VR-320 | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus VR-320
E-M5 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 offers outer dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 vs the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a104/9a10484417794b4dd3ebc7d45648a1624a971320" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 and VR-320 is 81 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73b3a/73b3a5b9721b887d0839150ffa54e369b7883fc2" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing technical specs. The image below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and VR-320.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 will offer you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb4fb/eb4fbb50c10efec52f61ff5ced67a9c60e79dd88" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c75a6/c75a67473e648e42cce3c1f95b231d851dc1ef64" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-04-30 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425g (0.94 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $179 |