Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-340
Portability
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
Olympus E-M5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- New Model is Olympus E-M5 II
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-M5 versus Olympus VR-340, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is very well matched but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M5 was launched 4 months later than the VR-340 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M5 scores against the VR-340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus VR-340
| E-M5 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+150k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-M5
| VR-340 | E-M5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus VR-340
| E-M5 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2012 |  | January 2012 | Similar age |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 offers exterior dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M5 versus Olympus VR-340 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-M5 vs the VR-340.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and VR-340 is 81 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and VR-340.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same MP but not the same sensor measurements. The E-M5 contains the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF simpler.
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Portrait photography information
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography information
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
megapixel count decent (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Street photography features
Olympus VR-340 Street photography features
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
supports touch to focus
environment sealing
good high ISO (25,600)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (125 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus E-M5 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
lack of phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Travel photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography factors
environment sealing
supports touch to focus
good resolution (16 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Landscape photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography factors
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
missing Time Lapse function
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Vlogging features
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging features
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
missing mic jack
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (125 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone socket
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-04-30 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 610k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 9.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 425 grams (0.94 pounds) | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 71 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $799 | $130 |