Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94ff5/94ff5a51162be558964f8f43fe832dff1cbdccd0" alt="Pentax K200D front Pentax K200D front"
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Launched April 2012
- Updated by Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Revealed September 2008
- Succeeded the Pentax K100D S
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M5 and Pentax K200D, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and K200D (10MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M5 was launched 3 years later than the K200D and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-M5 matches up against the K200D when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Pentax K200D. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Pentax K200D
E-M5 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2012 | ![]() | September 2008 | Fresher by 45 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-M5
K200D | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Pentax K200D
E-M5 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 enjoys external dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Pentax K200D has specifications of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 and Pentax K200D in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 compared to the K200D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83354/83354f6d1911a98232a3047bd8f78dca4fb2b369" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and K200D is 81 and 61 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46c0b/46c0ba08fb68d4dafa51952e1488af0415b34fa5" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and K200D.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus E-M5 will show extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/937f6/937f64f358180ce1940be3c5a6d58b2c3d2a0074" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f96d2/f96d265d952056173689d2153e9879d7de2ee2ba" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Pentax K200D |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2012-04-30 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 425g (0.94 pounds) | 690g (1.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 71 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | 826 | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $799 | $600 |