Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D
81 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf617/cf61718ac58869295cb38cf35e9b7b4cd1b425d5" alt="Pentax K20D front Pentax K20D front"
59 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Previous Model is Pentax K10D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-M5 versus Pentax K20D, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the K20D (15MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and K20D (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M5 was launched 3 years after the K20D which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K20D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M5 grades versus the K20D in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Pentax K20D. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Pentax K20D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Pentax K20D
E-M5 | K20D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2012 | ![]() | June 2008 | Newer by 47 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K20D over the Olympus E-M5
K20D | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Pentax K20D
E-M5 | K20D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 has outer dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Pentax K20D has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 versus Pentax K20D in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 compared to the K20D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80fb6/80fb6a568cf7bc93c0049172f1a8b4a896efb020" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 and K20D is 81 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b40a5/b40a53d056c6fdd3b3da2ab2209dfdfe59990912" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The image underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and K20D.
As you can tell, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M5 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c93c6/c93c6b7324736df17de1574cb40c09845d616c08" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a4fe/2a4fef6c1fe222bddde454968bfa60e43e6b40e4" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax K20D Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Pentax K20D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Pentax K20D |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2012-04-30 | 2008-06-25 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4672 x 3104 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 425 grams (0.94 pounds) | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 71 | 65 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | 826 | 639 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | D-LI50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $799 | $700 |