Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53f79/53f79318b036268028db17024c8c792be3aa6f4f" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 front Pentax Optio WG-2 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 and Pentax WG-2, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the WG-2 (16MP) is fairly close but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M5 was brought out 3 months later than the WG-2 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M5 grades against the WG-2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Pentax WG-2
E-M5 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+150k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-M5
WG-2 | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Pentax WG-2
E-M5 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | ![]() | February 2012 | Same age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 has got outer measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 and Pentax WG-2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 against the WG-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0096a/0096ad5080accd7655eb901f676395e4560120f5" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 and WG-2 is 81 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f762/1f7621bf1dd8519410cb6f59c4b9e2679a1416cf" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 and WG-2.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got the exact same megapixels but different sensor measurements. The E-M5 provides the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/064c5/064c58b4de116746c3d339036d761c7b6d10197c" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5589c/5589cfc7e94d684a92f6472a13f270557bd9b18d" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2012-04-30 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425 gr (0.94 pounds) | 192 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 260 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $799 | $350 |