Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax ist DL2
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
69 Imaging
44 Features
33 Overall
39
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax ist DL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Launched April 2012
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 565g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced January 2006
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax ist DL2 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M5 versus Pentax ist DL2, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and ist DL2 (6MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and ist DL2 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M5 was brought out 6 years later than the ist DL2 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax ist DL2 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M5 grades vs the ist DL2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax ist DL2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Pentax ist DL2. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Pentax ist DL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Pentax ist DL2
| E-M5 | ist DL2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2012 |  | January 2006 | Fresher by 77 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 210k | Clearer display (+400k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax ist DL2 over the Olympus E-M5
| ist DL2 | E-M5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Pentax ist DL2
| E-M5 | ist DL2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax ist DL2 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Pentax ist DL2 has measurements of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 565 grams (1.25 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 versus Pentax ist DL2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M5 compared to the ist DL2.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 and ist DL2 is 81 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax ist DL2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The graphic here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 and ist DL2.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus E-M5 will offer you extra detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer E-M5 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax ist DL2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-M5 vs Pentax ist DL2 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Pentax ist DL2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Pentax ist DL2 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-04-30 | 2006-01-27 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 6MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
| Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 610 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 9.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | No |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 425 grams (0.94 pounds) | 565 grams (1.25 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 71 | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | 826 | 639 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLN-1 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $799 | - |