Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX5
81 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58


92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-M5 versus Ricoh CX5, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and CX5 (10MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and CX5 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.

The E-M5 was released 10 months after the CX5 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M5 grades against the CX5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Ricoh CX5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Ricoh CX5
E-M5 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 10 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus E-M5
CX5 | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 610k | Crisper display (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh CX5
E-M5 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Ricoh CX5 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 versus Ricoh CX5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M5 compared to the CX5.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and CX5 is 81 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and CX5.
Clearly, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Ricoh CX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Ricoh CX5 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-04-30 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 610 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 425 gr (0.94 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $799 | $399 |