Clicky

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
81
Imaging
52
Features
70
Overall
59
Olympus OM-D E-M5 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus E-M5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
  • Launched April 2012
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M5 II
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Revealed November 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M5 was brought out 2 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M5 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-M5 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
RevealedApril 2012November 2009More modern by 31 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-M5

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro E-M5 
Display resolution920k610kClearer display (+310k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-M5 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 comes with outside dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 81 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to see the gap in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

As you can see, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M5 will render greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography highlights
71
manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW files
55
has manual focus
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
low megapixels (12MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Street photography camera
82
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
includes focus by touch
environment proofing
above average ISO range (25,600)
62
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography details
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
has no phase detect AF
32
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
does not have liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
low battery (320 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Travel photography camera
66
environment proofing
includes focus by touch
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
49
built-in flash
low battery (320 per charge)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Landscape photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography details
73
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
doesn't have Timelapse mode
46
has manual focus
decent sized screen (3 inches)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
low battery (320 CIPA)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging highlights
34
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone socket
20
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus OM-D E-M5Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Category Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2012-04-30 2009-11-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VI GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 200
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 50mm (1x)
Highest aperture - f/2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 610 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 1,440 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shooting rate 9.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 425 gr (0.94 lb) 453 gr (1.00 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 71 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 826 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photographs 320 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $799 $566