Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Launched April 2012
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M5 was brought out 2 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M5 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-M5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2012 | November 2009 | More modern by 31 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-M5
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 610k | Clearer display (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-M5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 comes with outside dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 81 and 77 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to see the gap in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M5 will render greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-04-30 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 425 gr (0.94 lb) | 453 gr (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 320 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $799 | $566 |