Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh WG-4
Portability
81 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
81 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
Olympus E-M5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 II
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh WG-4, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is fairly close but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and WG-4 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M5 was introduced 21 months earlier than the WG-4 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M5 grades against the WG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Ricoh WG-4
| E-M5 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+150k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus E-M5
| WG-4 | E-M5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | April 2012 | More recent by 21 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh WG-4
| E-M5 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 provides exterior dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 compared to the WG-4.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 and WG-4 is 81 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 and WG-4.
All in all, both of the cameras posses the exact same MP but different sensor measurements. The E-M5 has the larger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh easier. The older E-M5 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Portrait photography information
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography information
manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus E-M5
Street photography with Ricoh WG-4
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
features touch focus
weather proofing
very good ISO range (25,600)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus E-M5
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-4
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
weather proofing
does not have phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
environment proof
max frames per second low (2.0 fps)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery life (240 per charge)
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography info
weather proofing
features touch focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
no Timelapse mode
does not have selfie friendly screen
environment proof
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
bad battery life (240 per charge)
does not feature selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Landscape photography information
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography information
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
no Timelapse mode
you can focus manually
decently wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
environment proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
bad battery life (240 shots)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus E-M5
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
no microphone port
decently wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of mic jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-04-30 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 610 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 9.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 425 gr (0.94 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 71 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 images | 240 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $799 | $330 |