Clicky

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung GX-10

Portability
81
Imaging
52
Features
70
Overall
59
Olympus OM-D E-M5 front
 
Samsung GX-10 front
Portability
59
Imaging
48
Features
43
Overall
46

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
  • Announced April 2012
  • Successor is Olympus E-M5 II
Samsung GX-10
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Pentax KAF2 Mount
  • 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Replacement is Samsung GX-20
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview

Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M5 versus Samsung GX-10, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and GX-10 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M5 was introduced 5 years after the GX-10 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-M5 grades against the GX-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Samsung GX-10

 E-M5 GX-10 
ReleasedApril 2012September 2006More modern by 69 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution610k210kClearer screen (+400k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus E-M5

 GX-10 E-M5 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Samsung GX-10

 E-M5 GX-10 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 comes with outside dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-10 has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M5 versus Samsung GX-10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 against the GX-10.

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 and GX-10 is 81 and 59 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The picture here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and GX-10.

Plainly, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 with its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Olympus E-M5 will deliver greater detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung GX-10 as a Portrait photography camera
71
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
52
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Street photography information
Samsung GX-10 Street photography information
82
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
supports touch focus
weather sealing
very good high ISO (25,600)
64
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
screen is fixed
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Sports photography highlights
Samsung GX-10 Sports photography highlights
67
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
weather sealing
lack of phase detect AF
52
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
weather proof
supports phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Travel photography factors
Samsung GX-10 Travel photography factors
66
weather sealing
supports touch focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
49
weather proof
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse function
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Landscape photography factors
Samsung GX-10 Landscape photography factors
73
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
lack of Timelapse function
55
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Pentax KAF2 mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
small screen (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Vlogging details
Samsung GX-10 Vlogging details
34
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone port
9
no video recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 and Samsung GX-10
 Olympus OM-D E-M5Samsung GX-10
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 Samsung GX-10
Class Advanced Mirrorless Advanced DSLR
Announced 2012-04-30 2006-09-21
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VI -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 35 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Pentax KAF2
Available lenses 107 151
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of display 610k dot 210k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder resolution 1,440k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x 0.64x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 9.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 425 grams (0.94 pounds) 793 grams (1.75 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 71 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 826 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $799 $850