Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung HZ35W
81 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58


91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung HZ35W, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.

The E-M5 was manufactured 23 months after the HZ35W which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M5 matches up against the HZ35W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Samsung HZ35W
E-M5 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 23 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-M5
HZ35W | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 610k | Sharper screen (+4k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Samsung HZ35W
E-M5 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 features physical dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M5 compared to the HZ35W.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 and HZ35W is 81 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking technical specs. The image here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 should have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also called | - | WB650 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-04-30 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 610k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425 gr (0.94 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $799 | $300 |