Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung SH100
81 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
99 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung SH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung SH100 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung SH100, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the SH100 (14MP) is very close but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and SH100 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M5 was released 17 months after the SH100 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M5 matches up vs the SH100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung SH100 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Samsung SH100. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Samsung SH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Samsung SH100
| E-M5 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 17 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Olympus E-M5
| SH100 | E-M5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Samsung SH100
| E-M5 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung SH100 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 has got physical measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Samsung SH100 has sizing of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung SH100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 versus the SH100.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and SH100 is 81 and 99 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung SH100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 and SH100.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 will render extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung SH100 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-M5 vs Samsung SH100 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Samsung SH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Samsung SH100 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-04-30 | 2011-01-04 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4230 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | () |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 610k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 425g (0.94 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 71 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $799 | $200 |