Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cfb5/1cfb573f9a199713750718c4e753341b4a66f33c" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front"
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Introduced April 2012
- New Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released January 2008
- Later Model is Sony A330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-M5 versus Sony A300, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M5 was introduced 4 years later than the A300 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M5 matches up against the A300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Sony A300
E-M5 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | ![]() | January 2008 | More recent by 52 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-M5
A300 | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Sony A300
E-M5 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 has got exterior measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sony A300 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 versus Sony A300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 compared to the A300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/863b8/863b8ea697e5530d8ac319eb6c8c5fe3fa8a721b" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 and A300 is 81 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13608/13608b05dd3f1361fb8d82c0dc62863f6d0fd880" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 and A300.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Olympus E-M5 will give extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de208/de208b1b719a45f5e35012020408fa7a9fc0735f" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3cb6/a3cb61da5ae1a4ac5de9779eb6d00eefc4f33e85" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-04-30 | 2008-01-30 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 610k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425g (0.94 lb) | 632g (1.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $799 | $0 |