Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b299f/b299f5a5afefcfe28ea9cd44a81dc7ccf61def89" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front"
67 Imaging
50 Features
50 Overall
50
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Announced April 2012
- Updated by Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
- Released May 2009
- Succeeded the Sony A300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and A330 (10MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and A330 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M5 was released 2 years later than the A330 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M5 matches up against the A330 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A330. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Sony A330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Sony A330
E-M5 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus E-M5
A330 | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Sony A330
E-M5 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 comes with exterior measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sony A330 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") and a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 vs the A330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2931/f2931bda58c34ac708d0ecd523d032f700835bf9" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and A330 is 81 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43539/435395b157b67aa0523f675c017f22f95cfad492" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The graphic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 and A330.
To sum up, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-M5 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3dbf/d3dbffd4f179c9b763bcae69a56c9917ab505203" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2f04/f2f04bfbf546437979dc0133919ac7630bbc1279" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A330 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2012-04-30 | 2009-05-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 425 grams (0.94 lbs) | 529 grams (1.17 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 71 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | 826 | 535 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 230 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $799 | $545 |