Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H20
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Launched April 2012
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Released May 2009
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H20 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-M5 versus Sony H20, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and H20 (10MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and H20 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M5 was manufactured 3 years after the H20 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H20 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M5 scores against the H20 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H20 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Sony H20
E-M5 | H20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | May 2009 | More modern by 37 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 610k | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Olympus E-M5
H20 | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Sony H20
E-M5 | H20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 offers external measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Sony H20 has sizing of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 versus Sony H20 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M5 against the H20.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and H20 is 81 and 87 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The image here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 and H20.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 will show extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H20 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-04-30 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 610k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 425 gr (0.94 lbs) | 250 gr (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $799 | $249 |