Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Successor is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-P1 and Olympus TG-860, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-P1 (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-P1 was announced 6 years earlier than the TG-860 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-P1 scores vs the TG-860 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P1 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-P1 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Olympus TG-860
E-P1 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-P1
TG-860 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 67 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Olympus TG-860
E-P1 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-P1 features physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-P1 and Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P1 against the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ee7e/0ee7ee72197652f096d1a504e34a8af803e9d908" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P1 and TG-860 is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a86/d3a868c1cd7f27043259ac73a415aa7dc2f1ba67" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P1 and TG-860.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-P1 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-860 will resolve extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The older E-P1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/638fa/638fa582ca7645eaf816a55072285111351e42cc" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e226/8e2268e5ee147de962f82861e57db755d31673d7" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-07-29 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 pounds) | 224g (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 300 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $182 | $279 |