Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched July 2009
- Replacement is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-P1 versus Olympus TG-320, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P1 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly similar but the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-P1 was launched 3 years prior to the TG-320 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-P1 matches up versus the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P1 & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-P1 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Olympus TG-320
E-P1 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-P1
TG-320 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 29 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Olympus TG-320
E-P1 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P1 comes with external measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-P1 versus Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-P1 versus the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86bbd/86bbd506ee486e5705853bcb95243e3844f1b38e" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-P1 and TG-320 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ff59/4ff5946db4987055bf3c9e026f612c972c52267b" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P1 and TG-320.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-P1 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-320 will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-P1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41623/41623be2f0f1859b023c66ecb4dfecc6ac9d2043" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79d0a/79d0ae024f3a8f91bf0b619b2bd1f9d1c54a0a22" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus TG-320 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-07-29 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 150 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $182 | $0 |