Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched July 2009
- Successor is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-P1 versus Olympus TG-4, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-P1 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-P1 was released 6 years prior to the TG-4 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-P1 scores vs the TG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P1 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-P1 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Olympus TG-4
E-P1 | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-P1
TG-4 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 69 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Olympus TG-4
E-P1 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P1 enjoys physical measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-P1 versus Olympus TG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-P1 against the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/772dd/772dd324e1f8d93c6c9811a624b7a6afbd785f85" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P1 and TG-4 is 86 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04c77/04c777761980886582e1a10feb9a23367e970d95" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P1 and TG-4.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-P1 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-4 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-P1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd519/cd5196ffc9c3c1be0801fe988d8e7fb1ad7ff923" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03c4b/03c4b83b2c72c8dd7681223b7bb6a594ab30c355" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-07-29 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 380 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $182 | $379 |