Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched July 2009
- Successor is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-P1 versus Olympus TG-4, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-P1 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-P1 was released 6 years prior to the TG-4 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-P1 scores vs the TG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P1 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-P1 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Olympus TG-4
| E-P1 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-P1
| TG-4 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 | July 2009 | Newer by 69 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Olympus TG-4
| E-P1 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P1 enjoys physical measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-P1 versus Olympus TG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-P1 against the TG-4.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P1 and TG-4 is 86 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P1 and TG-4.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-P1 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-4 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-P1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-29 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 380 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $182 | $379 |