Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-P1 and Olympus VG-160, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-P1 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very similar but the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-P1 was announced 3 years before the VG-160 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-P1 scores vs the VG-160 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P1 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-P1 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Olympus VG-160
E-P1 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-P1
VG-160 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 29 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Olympus VG-160
E-P1 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-P1 features physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-P1 and Olympus VG-160 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-P1 compared to the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/079c5/079c51589533f973853d0f113f502aeba057f512" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P1 and VG-160 is 86 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc0fb/fc0fb328cf60cae1f2c37296afb362ff765ba451" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P1 and VG-160.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-P1 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus VG-160 will offer extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-P1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8020/e8020ae71637e283ad66015e4e3a08869afefc9e" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/181dd/181ddc2f5347f9bfff1648f0a4da1a57b43f9ba0" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus VG-160 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-07-29 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 165 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $182 | $90 |