Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released July 2009
- Renewed by Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-P1 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-P1 was released 9 years before the ZS200 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-P1 matches up versus the ZS200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P1 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P1 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-P1 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-P1
ZS200 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 104 months |
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+1010k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Panasonic ZS200
E-P1 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P1 has exterior measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-P1 vs the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc88e/dc88eebfe502e6886416f434865afd7b4ce87b65" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P1 and ZS200 is 86 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12145/121457d825fbd24ce8d28da7e3fe9c3c21cc887f" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The picture here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P1 and ZS200.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-P1 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-P1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e46/77e46f05f15dd10da7c0aab0254e2547240a8a3c" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c17e9/c17e94301b6ac04ee6e46280a353fee2a1822662" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-07-29 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) | 340 grams (0.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 370 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $182 | $800 |