Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13746/13746b655510dbf858df8e35d753589370ec8925" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Later Model is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-P1 versus Panasonic FP2, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-P1 (12MP) and the FP2 (14MP) is very well matched but the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and FP2 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-P1 was unveiled 5 months prior to the FP2 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-P1 grades vs the FP2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P1 Gallery & Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Panasonic FP2
E-P1 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus E-P1
FP2 | E-P1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Panasonic FP2
E-P1 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2010 | Similar age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P1 provides physical measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Panasonic FP2 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-P1 versus Panasonic FP2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-P1 vs the FP2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d6b0/5d6b08c53e2ccae22de6cb2eaea349169648b1b6" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P1 and FP2 is 86 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ee9/a6ee93a9d61d5e993125e8525fa19197b00573b0" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The photograph below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P1 and FP2.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-P1 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic FP2 will resolve greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9651a/9651a38a9847e94d81a3d5552d593bb84aff1b0d" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83659/836596efbfcdb71aac79e8e1876f013f2fd12f92" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-07-29 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 151 grams (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $182 | $80 |