Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched July 2009
- Successor is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-P1 and Panasonic FX75, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-P1 (12MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-P1 was unveiled 10 months before the FX75 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-P1 matches up vs the FX75 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-P1 Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Panasonic FX75
E-P1 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-P1
FX75 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 10 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Panasonic FX75
E-P1 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P1 offers external measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-P1 and Panasonic FX75 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-P1 vs the FX75.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0d9c/a0d9c9dd26e2fd534cf01858c69d2a2b32422204" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-P1 and FX75 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc0e0/dc0e001ff0caba6f9c9aaf5478537dc09fa69e9a" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P1 and FX75.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-P1 with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Panasonic FX75 will produce more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-P1 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a99c/7a99c7852a7350e41827833b2db74fe83129c79d" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f5b0/2f5b01321dbfad227c0621ca4e8207fb2f4958bb" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-07-29 | 2010-06-01 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $182 | $139 |