Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
65 Imaging
35 Features
64 Overall
46
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Later Model is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ100
- Renewed by Panasonic FZ300
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-P1 versus Panasonic FZ200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-P1 (12MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is fairly close but the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-P1 was unveiled 4 years before the FZ200 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-P1 matches up versus the FZ200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-P1 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Panasonic FZ200
| E-P1 | FZ200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-P1
| FZ200 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 36 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Panasonic FZ200
| E-P1 | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P1 features exterior dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-P1 versus Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-P1 versus the FZ200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P1 and FZ200 is 86 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The picture here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P1 and FZ200.
All in all, each of these cameras have the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The E-P1 includes the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The more aged E-P1 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-29 | 2012-07-18 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic V | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 588 grams (1.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 540 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $182 | $499 |