Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
65 Imaging
35 Features
64 Overall
46
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Later Model is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ100
- Renewed by Panasonic FZ300
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-P1 versus Panasonic FZ200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-P1 (12MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is fairly close but the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-P1 was unveiled 4 years before the FZ200 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-P1 matches up versus the FZ200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-P1 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Panasonic FZ200
| E-P1 | FZ200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-P1
| FZ200 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 36 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Panasonic FZ200
| E-P1 | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P1 features exterior dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-P1 versus Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-P1 versus the FZ200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P1 and FZ200 is 86 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The picture here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P1 and FZ200.
All in all, each of these cameras have the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The E-P1 includes the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The more aged E-P1 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-29 | 2012-07-18 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic V | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 588 grams (1.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 540 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $182 | $499 |