Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e7/eb0e7d68430f7af24efc1c439232dbd28d053d73" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front"
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released July 2009
- Replacement is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Launched July 2015
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus E-P1 versus Panasonic FZ300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-P1 (12MP) and the FZ300 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-P1 was manufactured 7 years earlier than the FZ300 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-P1 scores versus the FZ300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-P1 Gallery and Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Panasonic FZ300
E-P1 | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-P1
FZ300 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 72 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Panasonic FZ300
E-P1 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P1 enjoys outer measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ300 has sizing of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-P1 versus Panasonic FZ300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-P1 and the FZ300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b6b0/8b6b07676f551fc0b82aaf6d30788482507896a0" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P1 and FZ300 is 86 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7fe0/e7fe035f479d7c05aa99814d745299c3d16cc751" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The image here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P1 and FZ300.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-P1 has the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF less difficult. The more aged E-P1 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3141d/3141d4ddfa1d0e48790e3e1495af576e9d112a72" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3694d/3694d9bb54c35297ca8eb03ada3afe59776d7d23" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-29 | 2015-07-16 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | 691 gr (1.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 380 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $182 | $598 |