Clicky

Olympus E-P1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P1 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Olympus E-P1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus E-P1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Renewed by Olympus E-P2
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Introduced March 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-P1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-P1 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-P1 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is fairly close but the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-P1 was brought out 7 months earlier than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-P1 matches up versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 E-P1 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-P1

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC E-P1 
IntroducedMarch 2010July 2009More recent by 7 months
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 E-P1 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Olympus E-P1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P1 provides physical dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-P1 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-P1 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Olympus E-P1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-P1 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 86 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-P1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P1 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

As you have seen, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-P1 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-P1 will render greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older E-P1 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-P1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P1 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography info
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12MP)
36
manual focus
supports RAW formats
no liveview
low MP (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P1 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography highlights
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition (355g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P1 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Sports photography camera
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
terrible battery life (300 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
low MP (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P1 Travel photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography details
43
no Timelapse recording
terrible battery life (300 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
60
lighter than competition (355 grams)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
low MP (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P1 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography features
60
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (300 shots)
no Timelapse recording
47
manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
low MP (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-P1
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detection focusing
does not have selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone jack
28
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (355 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-P1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P1 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus PEN E-P1Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus PEN E-P1 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-07-29 2010-03-18
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355g (0.78 lbs) 355g (0.78 lbs)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures 410 pictures
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $182 $349