Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung HZ35W
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also Known as WB650
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung HZ35W, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-P1 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-P1 was brought out 10 months before the HZ35W which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-P1 grades against the HZ35W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P1 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-P1 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Samsung HZ35W
| E-P1 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-P1
| HZ35W | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 10 months | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Samsung HZ35W
| E-P1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P1 has outside measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P1 and the HZ35W.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P1 and HZ35W is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P1 and HZ35W.
All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical megapixel count but not the same sensor sizing. The E-P1 has got the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The older E-P1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P1 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | - | WB650 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-29 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 355g (0.78 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $182 | $300 |