Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
- New Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus E-PM2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras and both are built by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-P2 was launched 4 years before the E-PM2 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-P2 scores versus the E-PM2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-PM2
| E-P2 | E-PM2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-P2
| E-PM2 | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2013 | April 2010 | More modern by 37 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus E-PM2
| E-P2 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 has got outer measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus E-PM2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-P2 compared to the E-PM2.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and E-PM2 is 86 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and E-PM2.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus E-PM2 to give you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2010-04-22 | 2013-05-21 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | 505 | 932 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 360 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $799 | $448 |