Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
- New Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus E-PM2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras and both are built by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-P2 was launched 4 years before the E-PM2 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-P2 scores versus the E-PM2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-PM2
| E-P2 | E-PM2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-P2
| E-PM2 | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2013 | April 2010 | More modern by 37 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus E-PM2
| E-P2 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 has got outer measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus E-PM2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-P2 compared to the E-PM2.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and E-PM2 is 86 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and E-PM2.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus E-PM2 to give you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2010-04-22 | 2013-05-21 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | 505 | 932 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 360 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $799 | $448 |