Olympus TG-5 vs Sony QX30
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
91 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-4
- Renewed by Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Revealed September 2014
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony QX30 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-5 and Sony QX30, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-5 (12MP) and QX30 (20MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-5 was brought out 2 years later than the QX30 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TG-5 scores against the QX30 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony QX30 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Sony QX30
TG-5 | QX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | September 2014 | More recent by 33 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus TG-5
QX30 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Sony QX30
TG-5 | QX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-5 has outside dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sony QX30 has sizing of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-5 and Sony QX30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-5 against the QX30.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-5 and QX30 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The visual here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-5 and QX30.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Sony QX30 to give more detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern TG-5 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-5 vs Sony QX30 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
Category | Waterproof | Lens-style |
Launched | 2017-05-17 | 2014-09-03 |
Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | - |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | None |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 200 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $449 | $348 |