Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Older Model is Olympus E-P1
- Updated by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus SP-565UZ, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is relatively close but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-P2 was revealed 16 months after the SP-565UZ which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-P2 matches up vs the SP-565UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-P2 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 16 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-P2
SP-565UZ | E-P2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-P2 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 offers external measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus SP-565UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P2 versus the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c25e2/c25e2d589919696234b3879cf8b744e6f9b2fbb2" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and SP-565UZ is 86 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6d8c/d6d8c9692aa246aa9262c3238ac8d28e7cfaf6cd" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and SP-565UZ.
All in all, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P2 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-P2 will render extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher E-P2 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79ac2/79ac2a01928772e6c124b5c8a1d860686930bb37" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62616/626165b9aed034b382d4a4aba5d35fc85fcee8fc" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-04-22 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 pounds) | 413g (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $400 |