Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49476/49476823376bf1f79d845d8994f5bd8b0081bd2b" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ front Olympus SP-590 UZ front"
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
- Updated by Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
- Successor is Olympus SP-600 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-590 UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the SP-590 UZ (12MP) is very similar but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and SP-590 UZ (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-P2 was released 16 months later than the SP-590 UZ making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-P2 scores vs the SP-590 UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus SP-590 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-P2 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 16 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus E-P2
SP-590 UZ | E-P2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-P2 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 offers physical measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Olympus SP-590 UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-590 UZ in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-P2 vs the SP-590 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5618e/5618e4a8c8845f8ee016204c10c82f3fbb672deb" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and SP-590 UZ is 86 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/315cc/315cc06f502f065c2101200fb4c159c6b77dc431" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The graphic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P2 and SP-590 UZ.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The E-P2 has the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The more recent E-P2 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66d59/66d59844aed623e1813d54376ce5a2ab78d69570" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4ea7/a4ea7e4fb0fbac18ef3b81ad388b8773a73b27d5" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus SP-590 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus SP-590 UZ |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-04-22 | 2009-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lb) | 413 gr (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $799 | $249 |