Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Introduced January 2012
- Replaced the Olympus SP-610UZ
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus SP-620 UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-P2 was manufactured 20 months prior to the SP-620 UZ making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-P2 matches up against the SP-620 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus SP-620 UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-P2 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-P2
SP-620 UZ | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | April 2010 | More recent by 20 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-P2 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P2 enjoys exterior measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus SP-620 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus SP-620 UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-P2 vs the SP-620 UZ.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and SP-620 UZ is 86 and 78 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P2 and SP-620 UZ.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus SP-620 UZ will resolve greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-04-22 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $799 | $199 |