Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-1

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
53
Overall
45

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Introduced April 2010
  • Older Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-P3
Olympus SH-1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Revealed March 2014
  • Replacement is Olympus SH-2
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-1 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus SH-1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and SH-1 (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and SH-1 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-P2 was manufactured 4 years prior to the SH-1 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-1 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-P2 grades versus the SH-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus SH-1

 E-P2 SH-1 
Manually focus More precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Olympus E-P2

 SH-1 E-P2 
RevealedMarch 2014April 2010Newer by 47 months
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SH-1

 E-P2 SH-1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P2 provides outside dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-1 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus SH-1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P2 versus the SH-1.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and SH-1 is 86 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The image underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and SH-1.

All in all, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-P2 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SH-1 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SH-1 as a Portrait photography camera
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
37
decent MP (16MP)
provides face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Street photography info
Olympus SH-1 Street photography info
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
64
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides focus via touch
lighter than competition (271 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-P2
Sports photography with Olympus SH-1
40
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
not so great battery life (300 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
51
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery (380 CIPA)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Travel photography info
Olympus SH-1 Travel photography info
43
lack of Time Lapse mode
not so great battery life (300 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly display
74
better than average battery (380 per charge)
lighter than competition (271g)
provides focus via touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
Landscape photography with Olympus SH-1
60
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12MP)
not so great battery life (300 shots)
lack of Time Lapse mode
49
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
better than average battery (380 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging factors
Olympus SH-1 Vlogging factors
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection focus
does not feature selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
37
rather wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external mic support
lighter than competition (271 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SH-1
 Olympus PEN E-P2Olympus Stylus SH-1
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-P2 Olympus Stylus SH-1
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-04-22 2014-03-31
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic V TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355 gr (0.78 pounds) 271 gr (0.60 pounds)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images 380 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $799 $349